Beyond the "AI Pentest": Why Risk Assessment Is the Real End Game
In the consulting world, clients love the word "Pentest." It's familiar. It's a known line item. They know what the report will look like, how long it takes, and that it satisfies a "Security Testing" checkbox for auditors.
But when a client asks for an "AI Pentest" or "LLM Red Teaming," they are often asking for the wrong thing.
Unlike traditional software—where a SQL Injection vulnerability is a deterministic flaw that must be fixed—AI vulnerabilities are probabilistic, inherent, and often not patchable. You can always trick a model if you try hard enough. Spending 40 hours proving that a model occasionally makes mistakes is a costly dead end.
As security professionals, our job is to pivot the conversation from: "Can you break this?" → "Does it matter if this breaks?"
This guide outlines an AI Risk Assessment methodology that delivers far more value than a traditional pentest because it focuses on Threat Modeling, Governance, Compliance, and Context.